Does a leopard change its spots ???

Tags

Envision-TV, Imagination TV, IMTV, Steven Samblis, WSJ

While the hype has died down of late, you can bet that Mr. Steven Samblis has not given up on the gravy train, aka IMTV.  Perhaps now would be a good time to revisit some of Mr. Samblis’s previous history as it relates to the securities industry.  One needs to ask themselves before investing in Mr. Samblis… does a leopard change its spots???

This, from the Wall Street Journal archive (which is available here):  As you read through the article, notice the similarities to his actions of late.

wsj.com

Target in SEC Case Is Still Promoting Stocks on the Net

Jason Anders The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition

Updated Feb. 12, 1999 2:24 p.m. ET

Just over a year ago, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought a complaint against Steven Samblis, a Florida stock promoter who, the agency alleged, was passing himself off as an independent stock picker without disclosing he had been paid to promote companies.

The widely publicized complaint hasn’t deterred Mr. Samblis.

The SEC lawyer who led the case against Mr. Samblis says he still appears to be violating securities laws. Mr. Samblis, a former broker who was once fined because of a customer complaint, continues to promote stocks on the Web. He is now trying to sidestep SEC rules on disclosing compensation by paying a second company to publish promotional materials on his behalf.

Mr. Samblis, who did not admit or deny the SEC allegations last year and denies any wrongdoing since that case, is president of Fortune Marketing & Capital Consultants Inc., based in Longview, Fla. In exchange for compensation, Fortune distributes promotional articles about companies in a magazine called the Small Cap Journal, and on a Web site (www.smallcapjournal.com) with the same name.

In its original complaint against Mr. Samblis — one of the SEC’s first involving stock promotion on the Internet — the agency said Mr. Samblis was “passing himself off as an independent and impartial stock picker when, in fact, he is nothing more than a paid pitchman.” Mr. Samblis agreed to an injunction the agency sought that essentially ordered him to stop violating securities law, and since then the SEC has been trying to force Mr. Samblis to pay a fine in that case.

“It now appears that not only is he flouting the SEC and the securities laws, but it seems pretty clear to me, in my opinion, that he is violating the court order,” says Christian Bartholomew, the SEC’s lead attorney in its case against Mr. Samblis. Mr. Bartholomew says the SEC, which is continuing its investigation, may seek an even tougher penalty against Mr. Samblis because of his recent activities.

Mr. Bartholomew says he believes that since the injunction, Mr. Samblis has promoted companies on the Web and in the magazine without fully disclosing his compensation arrangements with those companies, as required by securities law.

But Mr. Samblis maintains that he has disclosed compensation as required. Indeed, early this week, the Web site contained details of Mr. Samblis’s compensation arrangements with the companies being promoted there. Mr. Bartholomew declines to comment on whether those disclosures were adequate or to identify specific instances of violations.

Regardless, on Wednesday, Mr. Samblis sold the magazine and Web site to a second company, Lyons Media Group, a move that he says relieves him of any obligation to disclose compensation.

“The law says that if you publish a magazine or newsletter you’ve got to disclose,” Mr. Samblis says. “I’ve just made my life a lot easier by no longer publishing it. I’ve hired someone else to do it.”

The Web site still carries the same promotional stories on Mr. Samblis’s clients. The Web site’s disclosure on compensation was replaced by a single statement noting that Mr. Samblis’s company is paying Lyons Media $4,000 a month to feature his promotional materials on the site.

But that’s not good enough, the SEC says.

“The statute is clear. It says you can’t directly or indirectly promote without disclosing compensation,” says Mr. Bartholomew, the SEC lawyer. “You can’t insulate yourself from liability by selling the company.”

The magazine’s new owner, Dennis Lyons, president of Lyons Media Group in Howey-in-the-Hills, Fla., says he doesn’t think he has to disclose anything because he isn’t being paid directly by the companies. He says the disclosure on the site that he is being paid by Mr. Samblis’s company is “a voluntary disclosure.”

Mr. Lyons has worked with Mr. Samblis since the start of the Small Cap Journal, providing printing services for the magazine.

Several of Mr. Samblis’s clients say they’re not concerned about his previous run-in with the SEC, and say they’re happy with the work he has done for them. “I found out about the thing with the SEC, and it didn’t bother me,” says Gratian Yatsevitch, executive vice president and co-founder of International Shoe Manufacturing Corp., a company with an office in Washington, D.C., that plans to manufacture shoes for sale in India and elsewhere.

In exchange for being promoted in Small Cap Journal, Mr. Yatsevitch says International Shoe gave Mr. Samblis $8,000, 15,000 shares of free-trading stock, 20,000 shares of restricted stock that cannot be sold for one year and warrants to purchase an additional 100,000 shares for 50 cents each. Since signing on with Mr. Samblis in November 1998, International Shoe’s shares have climbed as high as 88 cents a share on the National Association of Securities Dealers’ OTC Bulletin Board service. Its stock was quoted at 44 cents a share this week.

Mr. Yatsevitch says International Shoe came to Mr. Samblis, who is handling public and investor relations for the company, “just to get some recognition, and to shout our story a little bit.” According to the SmallCap Journal, if International Shoe is able to land certain contracts it’s angling for, “it can expect revenues in excess of $125 million annually within three years. Profits are expected to be in the 20% to 25% range.”

Mr. Yatsevitch says those numbers sound about right. But the company hasn’t had any sales or made any money since being founded in September 1993. It also hasn’t manufactured any shoes. Mr. Yatsevitch says the company has been focused on raising money to complete a manufacturing facility in New Delhi. He says that since the company began, $2 million has been raised from private investors, and he says the company is close to securing an additional $2 million in financing that will allow it to finish its factory. The company expects to start making shoes in May or June.

Mr. Samblis says he hasn’t sold any of the stock International Shoe paid him, and says he hasn’t exercised the warrants. When he does sell stock that he is paid by companies, he says, he does so “in a way that doesn’t affect the market.”

Mr. Samblis says he’s also still holding on to the 50,000 restricted shares paid to him by Millionaire.com, a new company that publishes a magazine and plans on hosting auctions — online and off — that target wealthy clients. The Bluffton, S.C., company retained Mr. Samblis in December 1998, when it was founded, to handle its investor relations. Its shares were quoted at $8.63 Thursday on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Mr. Samblis’s involvement with the company has drawn criticism from some participants in a stock-chat Web site, Silicon Investor (www.techstocks.com ). They have repeatedly posted information about Mr. Samblis’s SEC case on a message board dedicated to Millionaire.

Robert White, Millionaire’s president, says he investigated Mr. Samblis’s background and the SEC case before hiring him. “It seems like it was not a big thing, and there was this agreement that he would basically not do anything like that again,” says Mr. White. “As far as I’m concerned, he’s clean as a whistle. He has done a good job for us.”

During his career as a broker, Mr. Samblis worked for 10 firms during 12 years, according to records with the National Association of Securities Dealers.

In May 1990, the NASD censured Mr. Samblis, fined him $10,000 and suspended him for five days for allegedly recommending some options investments to three customers without having reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendations were suitable for them. Mr. Samblis denied the allegations and says he later sued an NASD witness in that case, alleging she had lied. A jury awarded him $219,000 in damages, he says.

Mr. Samblis never paid the NASD fine; it was discharged after he filed for bankruptcy protection in October 1990, citing mounting medical bills.

Separately, in January 1990, he was fired from his job at what was then Dean Witter after a client claimed two unauthorized trades were made in her account. Mr. Samblis denied any wrongdoing in that case.

In an interview on Tuesday, before selling the magazine and Web site, Mr. Samblis said his reputation has been unfairly damaged by the continued focus — by the media and his online critics — on his SEC case. He also defended the practice of taking cash or stock in exchange for promoting companies. “What we’re doing is a good thing, if it’s done right,” he said.

It’s the company you keep…

Tags

Envision-TV, Imagination TV, IMTV, Lloyd Lapidus, Steven Samblis

Well folks… ever heard the saying, you are the company you keep?   To those that may still have an open mind about the controversy over there having been a “sale” of IMTV… here is an interesting exercise in casting a huge doubt that there was ever such a “sale”.  Mr. Steven Samblis (opps, we mean KHudson) uses the term…   “prove it” frequently.  Well Mr. Samblis, if you want people to believe there really was a sale… file the “private transaction” agreement with the SEC.  It’s as simple as that.  Filing that document with the SEC would put to rest, once and for all, the controversy of sale or scam.   If you’re serious about dispelling the rumors and accusations… FILE THE DOCUMENT !  i.e PROVE IT !!!  You apparently want everyone else to “prove it”… now it’s time to put up or shut up as they say !

So… back to the company you keep.  What do the names Steven Samblis, Lloyd Lapidus, Peter Messineo, Terence Byrne, and Joseph Sirianni all have in common?  Well… it appears they all know one another, and possibly have for some time.  Isn’t that an interesting group of individuals.   Each name has a link associated with it, and the link will take you to information about the individual.  All these name are listed as “In his circles”.  In fact, the page lists 119 people in his circle.  Readers may recognize other names as well.  But, view fast, as it is likely to be deleted soon (but we grabbed a copy just in case).

Now, while you’re on the GDAR site, check out a few of the “Recent News” articles, specifically this one.  The entire article (and site) are interesting given the business they are in.  Specifically GDAR states:

“GDAR, organized as a Nevada Company, provides project development; medium and long-term finance solutions and investments into high growth industries that build shareholder value over a long period of time.” 

Sounds like they specialize in creative financing deals.  Maybe sort of like Asher provides “finance solutions”.  But here is the interesting text…

“During the previous fiscal year the overall revenue of the two companies was in excess of $3.5 million dollars with a combined net earnings of $325,000.”

If one of these companies referenced in the LOI Press Release is IMTV… where is the money they site???  Did Mr. Steven Samblis withhold this revenue cited from Investors???

Anyway… the associations seem to be too much of a coincidence to be meaningless.  The facts are what they are, and there appears to be too many questionable associations, coupled with the “private transaction” controversy, and the apparent refusal of the parties in the “Private transaction” agreement to file and release the document to the SEC… leads many to conclude it’s not what they are telling you.  You have plenty of empty rhetoric by the pumpers (KHudson the biggest pumper), and then you have the facts available with a simple Google search.  Are you going to believe the pumpers… or your lying eyes ?

http://www.symmetricalventures.io

Connecting the scams.  (thanks to “thelionwarrior”)

Do your DD folks… it could save you money you could invest elsewhere.

 

A “sale”… really ???

Tags

Envision-TV, Imagination TV, IMTV, Steven Samblis, Who's in charge

Folks see what they want to see… and pumpers post what they are told to post… and those that own IMTV stock are about now likely thinking that for all the shares that have been sold over the last 3-days with only a .0001 increase in PPS (which is not likely to hold), they are posting in an effort to gin up support so they can hope to correct their probable purchase error.

The ongoing controversy over Mr. Steven Samblis still owning the company seems to have some self-serving efforts at foot.  Those with experience in all things Samblis and his previous actions are confident KHudson is in fact Mr. Steven Samblis. Given the evidence, they are likely 100% correct.  There is no evidence KHudson is NOT Mr. Steven Samblis !

So… does Mr. Steven Samblis still own IMTV as the experienced watchers think… or, are they just so angry at having lost huge sums of money believing in Mr. Steven Samblis’s previous failed efforts, that they can not accept the truth???

Well… lets have a look at the evidence.  yes, guessing is fun, but should you really be guessing with your hard earned money ???  And although its a pretty stupid statement that all you can lose is 100%, who wants to lose anything if they don’t have to?

So… the pumpers make a big deal about the SEC filing.  Their statements seem to indicate a naive mindset that because it was filed with the SEC… it has to be true.  Well, not so fast, at least in the case of Mr. Steven Samblis.  We have documented previously that Mr. Samblis has filed inaccurate, and misleading, and some say illegal filings with the SEC.  See the proof here.  Not simply speculation, but actual documented proof.

Now… lets have a look at the 8K again… someone please point out where it says there was a “sale”.  We see the words “transaction“… but not “sale“.  Is it possible that the parties to the agreement did not understand the difference between a transaction, and a sale?  Do you really want to invest in a company where the parties to the agreement did not know the difference between a transaction and a sale ???  OR… was the word “transaction” used specifically to mislead readers?  Transaction does not mean sale.  AND… even if there was a “sale”… why not use the word SALE ???

Now… most folks who are trading stocks understand the basic structure of a company… at least they should.  Most know that the title of CEO does not necessarily mean “owner”.  A person can be CEO of a company, and not “own” the company.  Then there is the other troublesome choice of words used in the filing…”JOE SIRIANNI has consented to act …”  Use of the words “consented to act” seems to be purposefully chosen here also.   Is the “consent” based on something in the “private transaction” perhaps???

Now… for all the pumpers out there (likely in the employ of Asher), this is a common sense alert !  What you are about to see is the use of common sense, and since you are likely not interested in any common sense, you should skip over this part.  WHY were those specific words chosen, when there are other words that leave no uncertainty as to the actions ?  When one connects the dots (facts as they have been published – and there are many !), it makes a very strong case for there being a willingness to mislead.

Also, when investors look at about 100-million shares being sold in the last few days… with no significant PPS increase, that appears to be another indication of something not being right, or normal.  Usually, the PPS moves up as the volume moves up.  Significant increase in volume without a PPS increase, strongly indicates dilution… i.e. someone ginning up false interest to unload shares into the market.   Remember folks… if it’s Asher selling off the shares they were unable to unload previously (as a result of the toxic financing Mr. Steven Samblis entered into), their cost is likely 50% of current PPS, or, perhaps the “private transaction” involved Mr. Steven Samblis getting shares in exchange for something in the “private transaction” that he did not want you to know about, at likely a huge discounted price (i.e both could sell at .0001 and still make a bundle).  There must be something in there that they don’t want you to know about, otherwise they would have filed the agreement with the 8k.

Folks, nothing stands alone, specially when it comes to understanding Mr. Steven Samblis’s actions.  One needs to look at the ENTIRE picture.  To point to the 8K alone and conclude there was a “sale” of the company, is simply to ignore your common sense.  We have documented time and time again how Mr. Steven Samblis uses creative word choice in order to give himself deniability at some later date, and you should be asking yourself… WHY were those specific words chosen in the 8K when other words, more common words, more direct words, were available for use.

Also, go back a read the KHudson posts, only this time read them thinking it is in fact Mr. Steven Samblis.  Ask yourself… WHY and HOW does a brand new alias know so much about the inner workings of IMTV, and why is that person pumping the stock so feverishly ?  Then, if you still have any doubts that the poster is Mr. Steven Samblis, go back and read the posts of mrighttrade, dotd ,zurich, Bzippy,  FLWright , SunTzueyes, HouseSmith, CVeradero.  While you are reading those posts, ask yourself the same questions.  Also, take a look at this post outlining the same thoughts.

Folks, read the material and decide for yourself, but if you do read the material it will be difficult to come to any other conclusion than Mr. Steven Samblis still owns IMTV, and is still calling the shots.  Other than the 8K, which has some serious concerns… there is no other evidence indicating Mr. Steven Samblis is not in charge of IMTV.  Common sense alert here… if there really was a sale (and again the facts point to otherwise) does anyone think Mr. Steven Samblis simply walked away from the company without some form of compensation ???  Ask yourself… what is a “shell” worth, and then divide that by .0001, and you should have a handle on the number of shares coming to the market.

Still think “guessing is fun” ???  It likely depends on you owning shares of IMTV or not !

 

Turning lemons into lemonade !

Tags

Envision-TV, Imagination TV, IMTV, l, Lemons, Steven Samblis

WOW !!!  Gotta hand it to Samblis… he did it again.  In spite of tons of evidence indicating KHudson is Mr. Steven Samblis, he has managed to fool some into buying more shares, in spite of tons of evidence indicating Mr. Steven Samblis is still involved in IMTV.

Although he has to share some credit with the scummy pumpers that assisted in luring the low-information buyer into the deception.  However, no one forced them to hit the buy button, so they are as much to blame as the deceivers.  The unfortunate, but beneficial aspect of these new marks is they will now be added to the scores of those that went before them.  They will show up on the boards soon repeating what others before them have repeated,  i.e. stay away from this one.

Well… it’s time for a “told you so !”.  There was tons of information for those new buyers to read, but as they say… you can lead a horse to water – but you can’t make them drink.

Perhaps, soon, Mr. Samblis will get a visit from the IRS and or the SEC regarding his current and previous actions as CEO.  But then again, maybe Mr. Samblis has outsmarted them.  If he can find new buyers for IMTV stock, maybe he CAN outsmart the IRS and SEC.  Time will tell.

 

P.T. Barnum may have been right !

Tags

Envision-TV, IMTV, KHudson, Samblis owning stock, Steven Samblis

Yes folks… P.T. Barnum may have been right when he said “There is a sucker born every minute“.  For anyone believing the deception of KHudson over on Investors Hub, must truly be in the class of individuals susceptible to the BS of con-men.

KHudson, (who by the way many, if not most, believe is Mr. Steven Samblis deceiving low-information investors), states in one of his latest posts… “The new CEO has made a cool move with his latest filing.”   “Cool” is not how most would put it.  What the move has done is let IMTV operate without the investing public seeing the very information they should be looking at when deciding weather to purchase shares in the company.  “Cool”… no, most would call it deceptive and devious.

We have written about the overwhelming amount of information that points to Mr. Samblis still being involved in IMTV.  KHudson’s posts are an excellent example of this evidence.  Ask yourself… WHY would a brand new poster come on a message board that has historically been warning against the actions of Mr. Steven Samblis for years, and try to convince readers that there is a new CEO???  Many would point to the Samblis name being so toxic that no matter what it is associated with would be detrimental to the well being of that entity.  It has now become imperative that the Samblis name be removed from any and all aspects of IMTV if it is to be revived, and able to convince investors to buy more shares.  Be reminded here of the “Private Sale”.

Take a look at the below graphic, (the full copy is here), where in it Mr. Samblis (when he was still using his real name), states in no unambiguous way, that he is no longer involved with IMTV in any way – THEN HE DELETES THE POST !.   Then he sends Friends the following email (seen here).  Then he tries to get the reference to the document removed from the Friends site by filing a DMCA complaint, (seen here).

And here is why this post is so important that he tried everything he could to get it deleted.  In that post he states… “… I don’t own or control a single share.” (in fact the complete text of the paragraph is significant !)  So why is KHudson, who again many believe is Mr. Steven Samblis, trying so desperately to convince you that Mr. Samblis is not involved with IMTV ?  Maybe the next graphic provides further evidence Mr. Samblis is still involved.

IF, in fact, KHudson is Mr. Steven Samblis, OR, you simply believe it’s Mr. Samblis creating these posts, you now see the importance.  And further why it is so important that readers (or the SEC for that matter) do not discover that KHudson is Mr. Steven Samblis.  We told you here why the SEC would be concerned.  If at some point the SEC would investigate IMTV and Mr. Samblis’s activities as CEO, Mr. Samblis could be in for some real tough days.  Perhaps Mr. Samblis thinks that his use of the TOR application shields him from the SEC discovering any misrepresentation, he might want to consider those that have gone before him that were busted thinking they could outsmart the Federal Government.  No one knows if such an investigation is currently underway (they take their good-ole-time investigating anything, and are never public about such), but what do you think would happen to the PPS of your shares if any such investigation becomes public?  So, as you can see, Mr. Samblis has a lot a stake here.

There is a great quote in the signature line of the below graphic… don’t be among “the deceived”… do your homework before investing and make up your own mind if you think IMTV is a safe investment.

Going Dark…

Tags

Envision-TV, Going Dark, IMTV, Joseph S Sirriani, Steven Samblis

Looks like IMTV is “going dark”, with the filing of Form-15 today.  Although this is a distinction without a difference, since there has been no reporting for quite a while anyway.   Here is an article about the process.

Now… here is the most interesting part.  Given the huge controversy over Mr. Samblis having walked away from the company… notice the address of record listed on today’s filing.  Yes, that’s correct, its the very same address that has been used on many other SEC filings by Mr. Samblis.  i.e. although Mr. Steven Samblis states he has walked away from the company… the address of record has not changed.

Could the hyped new owner be using the very same office as Mr. Samblis… possible maybe, but not likely.  Here is the post we did about the location back in August of 2014.

So… you’re Joseph S. Serianni and you just took over the company, and A) it’s been over 5-months and no one has heard a peep from you, and B) both SEC filings that you filed have the same address as the previous owner, who doesn’t have the best reputation with running the company, and C) a new alias shows up on Investors Hub touting the resurgence of the company, just prior to filing the SEC Form-15, and the poster has all the hallmarks of the tactics Mr. Steven Samblis used to pump the company previously.  Did someone leave the hard boiled eggs out too long, because something just doesn’t smell right.

And… 60-milion shares traded today.

Certainly looks like an Asher dump, given they are all within 5-6 minutes of one another.  Remember… Asher likely bought these shares at a 50-60% discount off the current PPS, AND… because of the reverse split, they likely have even less cost in the shares, as we indicated here.  WOW… .00001 pps.  Yes, that’s 4-zero’s and a 1.  So, they paid $600.00 for those shares, and sold them today for $6000.00.  Not bad for 5-minutes work !  How can an any retail investor compete with that ???

So folks… looks like Mr. Steven Samblis took any IMTV investor money that was in the couch cushions and started a private company, but investors will likely never know a true account of their money, given the Form-15 filing today.   As they say… let the buyer beware.  Do your homework FIRST !

 

Absolutely NO proof…

Tags

Envision-TV, IMTV, KHudson, No-Proof, Steven Samblis

SO… let’s use a Samblis tactic here… there is absolutely NO proof that KHudson is NOT Mr. Steve Samblis !  However, there is plenty of evidence that he is.

Look at the above post by “KHudson”.  This is just one example of what many would call evidence of KHudson (and mrighttrade, dotd ,zurich, Bzippy,  FLWright , SunTzueyes, HouseSmith, CVeradero) being Mr. Steven Samblis.  Ask yourself… if Mr. Steven Samblis was not still involved with IMTV, WHY would KHudson come on a message board and in essence profess his love for Mr. Samblis ???

You may remember that right after Mr. Samblis filed the infamous 8K that indicated the change in leadership of IMTV, Mr. Samblis posted a long and basically an incoherent rant against those that would disbelieve Mr. Samblis’s departure from IMTV – then, he deleted the post.  See the Tumbler post here.

But again… Mr. Samblis would have you focus on what hasn’t happened yet, and ask you to ignore his long and controversial past.  In essence he is saying he is a completely changed man now, and can only make excellent decisions going forward.  People make mistakes, but they learn from them and hopefully correct such in the future, however with such an extensive history of bad decisions that Mr. Samblis has, there is now a clear and consistent pattern of bad decisions to predict the future with.

As they say…. those that ignore the past are condemned to repeat it.  That is certainly something to remember when dealing with Mr. Steven Samblis.

Again folks… do your homework before investing.

More bad news…

Tags

Default Judgement, Envision-TV, IMTV, Steven Samblis

Oh my… even more bad news for Mr. Steven M. Samblis.  It appears Mr. Samblis is having a string of bad luck with the courts.  Now it appears Mr. Samblis owes his landlord over 7-thousand dollars.  See court document here.

We have previously reported on this here.  Could it be that Mr. Samblis has squandered so much money attacking messengers that he ran IMTV into zero worth, and couldn’t even pay his rent?  How much of this was investor money?  And remember… there could still be another outstanding judgement 10-times larger than this one.  Details of that judgement are here.

However, it appears perhaps that there was enough money salvaged from the public company that Mr. Samblis was able to invest into his current efforts at becoming a media mogul and wannabe movie star.  He has several new websites touting his self described expertise in the movie business.  See below.

So, investors are likely asking themselves… how much return on investment will these sites be giving back to those that lost tons of money investing in Mr. Samblis and his public company???  Since Mr. Samblis appears to have taken all his business private… likely NONE of it will be returned !   Is this how Mr. Samblis treats those that go into business with him?  No wonder it appears he can’t pay his rent.  Its possible we will be seeing a new corporate address on his websites soon.

Folks… before investing in any of Mr. Samblis’s grandiose plans and promises, do your homework and research the man’s past, and specifically his dealing with those that did business with him in the past.  Five minutes Googling the man could possibly save you a lot of problems.

 

Samblis… shooting the messenger… AGAIN !

Tags

Deleted Denial, Envision-TV, IMTV, Steven Samblis

Yes folks, yet again Mr. Steven M. Samblis spends his time shooting the messenger instead of addressing the issues.  Mr. Samblis apparently has enough free time on his hands that he can create tumbler posts where he attacks the messenger, but not one word of it addresses the very important issues and questions on investors minds.  Apparently Mr. Samblis is an expert at shooting messengers, but running a company, well, not so much.

So, the issue in the forefront of most investors minds is… Mr. Samblis’s supposed exit from the public company.  There are some who believe he really has sold, and/or left the company.  While most others are not buying it at all.   So… apparently in an effort to put all the speculation to rest, Mr. Samblis creates his most vehement denial to date, stating that he is no longer affiliated with the company.  See the post here.  Yes, the post is laden with personal attacks (shooting the messengers), but none the less, its the most direct, to the point, denial that he is still involved.  That ends the controversy, right?  Well, not so fast.

Mr. Samblis DELETES the post only hours after posting it.  With the controversy so intense, coupled with  Mr. Samblis’s strong denial… WHY would he delete it ???  He surely didn’t remove it because he was remorseful he attacked his detractors, he continues to do so in his most recent tumbler post.

Additionally… when Mr. Samblis discovers that Friends has captured the deleted post and made it available for readers… we get nasty emails ordering us to remove the link to the post.  WHY is Mr. Samblis so upset that the post is being made available? ( Here are the emails Mr. Samblis sent to Larry regarding availability of the deleted post.)  This is Mr. Samblis’s strongest denial to date, and he not only deletes the post, but gets angry when it is still available for folks to see.  WHY ?

Not only do we get nasty emails (do most CEO’s write emails like this?) Mr. Samblis then files a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) complaint.  Of course, as you can see, this complaint was denied (as were his numerous other complaints also).  (See the complaintt here.)   And, by the way, for those of you new to IMTV, here is a link to details where Mr. Samblis attempted, and failed, to steal our sites from us.  Once again, Mr. Samblis was defeated in his efforts.

So… investors must be asking themselves… WHY does Mr. Samblis so vehemently deny his involvement with IMTV, then delete the post, AND take extraordinary actions to keep it from the public ?   Does Mr. Samblis address this in his most recent rant where he once again attempts to shoot the messenger?  No – he does not.  WHY ?

Mr. Samblis wines in his latest rant about his lost “business deals, relationships, and friendships“, but fails to mention that those folks he speaks about have minds of their own.  They likely have read the material available on the internet about Mr. Samblis, and made their own minds up based on the facts.  The facts are there, the reader makes up their own minds to believe the facts or not.  It is hard to argue the information is all lies, when the documents are there for all to see.  Mr. Samblis has had ample opportunity to address these “lies” as he calls them, but does he do it… NO !  He rather attempts to shoot the messenger.  He thinks that is a better tactic then addressing the facts head on.

Another question… WHY, if there really is a new owner, has he not presented himself, and defended his new company?  Mr. Joseph Collins wasn’t timid about stepping up after his appointment as President.   Ask youself… if you just bought a company, and folks were saying the old CEO (who many dislike) was still calling the shots… wouldn’t you put out a press release ASAP !   Wouldn’t you make EVERY attempt to dispel the rumors?

Yes… “Guessing is fun”, but when it comes to investing your hard earned dollars, get the facts !  The facts are available with a simple Google search.  Read the material, and YOU make the decision if the available material on Mr. Steven M. Samblis is accurate and believable or not.

 

 

Who’s kidding who ???

Tags

Envision-TV, Fortune Road Media, IMTV, Release the Contract, Steven Samblis

[UPDATED 1/16/2016… see below]

Well, most likely you have seen the Mr. Steven M. Samblis tumbler post.  The one where he appears to attempt to desperately convince readers that he no longer has anything to do with the public company( IMTV).   WHY ???

WHY does someone who states he no longer has anything to do with the company, tries so desperately to convince you (the potential investor) that he is no longer involved ???  It’s likely many others are asking the same question.    It just defies all logic.

Why would he care ?  Well… the old adage is, if something makes no logical sense – follow the money.  Oh wait… you can’t follow the money because it was a PRIVATE sale.  In other words… the parties to the contract of sale didn’t want you to know what the deal was.  Nothing suspicious about that, right?

Mr. Samblis… if you want readers to believe you have noting to do with the company… simply file the contract of sale with the SEC.  

According to the 8K, there is a contract of sale.  So Mr. Samblis, why take to a tumbler post to try so desperately to convince readers of your honesty, when the most direct route to that end would be to release the contract of sale to the SEC ?

Mr. Samblis appears very bitter and angry, in addition to desperate in the post,  trying to convince readers, once again, he is the victim. Once again, WHY would he be extremely bitter over folks thinking he is still involved ?  Logic, and common sense would tell many, it’s because he still  has something at stake regarding the public company.  Perhaps Mr. Samblis is bitter and angry that the plan to hit the reset button, has failed, like so many of his other initiatives (which were also not released to the SEC).

This tumbler post by Mr. Steven M. Samblis appears to be the strongest evidence yet that he still has some interest in the public company.  If not, WHY the “Private” sale, and WHY withhold the document from the SEC???

Mr. Samblis… you want readers to believe you – it’s simple… file the contract of sale with the SEC !  IMTV was (and is) a public company at the time of the “sale” – the contract should be made public.  You owned the company, you are a party to the contract, you can file it. 

 UPDATE: Well, that post didn’t last long.  As Mr. Samblis frequently does, he creates posts, or makes statements, such as the $192,000 per airport statement he made in the Stock Traders Radio broadcast, or the arrest page at MugShots.com, and others too numerous to list here, then he deletes the posts or broadcasts for unexplained reasons.  Well readers are free to draw their own conclusions about the original statements, and the subsequent deletions, and they frequently do.  Perhaps that is why many are not buying his latest desperate statement that he is no longer involved with IMTV.

However, as they say, once on the internet – always on the internet.  For those that wish to verify the information in our post above… HERE is the captured post as it appeared after it was published.